[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#777472: marked as done (unblock: icedove-l10n/31.4.0-1)



Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:48:23 +0100
with message-id <d071560f20e39b3bcef4fe62625908ad@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#777472: unblock: icedove-l10n/31.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #777472,
regarding unblock: icedove-l10n/31.4.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
777472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Please unblock package icedove-l10n

Christoph Goehre as package maintainer uploaded several days ago an updated
version of the l10n files for the icedove package.
By this upload a wrong Recommends on the package icedove-l10n-sr was fixed
and also a small update on the romanian language from the upstream source.

- From our point of view it would be good to keep the l10n package in sync
with the package version of icedove as the l10n packages have no reverse
depends except on icedove.

Here are the debdiff output for icedove-l10n-sr

$ debdiff icedove-l10n-sr_31.2.0-1_all.deb icedove-l10n-sr_31.4.0-1_all.deb
File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
- ------------------------------------------------
Depends: icedove (>= [-31.2.0),-] {+31.4.0),+} icedove (<< 32)
Recommends: [-hunspell-se-] {+hunspell-sr+}
Version: [-1:31.2.0-1-] {+1:31.4.0-1+}

and for icedove-l10n-ro

$ debdiff icedove-l10n-ro_31.2.0-1_all.deb icedove-l10n-ro_31.4.0-1_all.deb
File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
- ------------------------------------------------
Depends: icedove (>= [-31.2.0),-] {+31.4.0),+} icedove (<< 32)
Version: [-1:31.2.0-1-] {+1:31.4.0-1+}

unblock icedove-l10n/31.4.0-1

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=8Ud/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le 2015-02-08 17:12, Carsten Schoenert a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Please unblock package icedove-l10n

Christoph Goehre as package maintainer uploaded several days ago an updated
version of the l10n files for the icedove package.
By this upload a wrong Recommends on the package icedove-l10n-sr was fixed and also a small update on the romanian language from the upstream source.


Unblocked. (Please avoid unnecessary changes in the future).

Regards,

--
Mehdi

--- End Message ---

Reply to: