[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#776616: unblock: fso stack



On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 at 11:31:58 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > This package has a few changes that do not follow the described pattern:
> 
> Ah right, I forgot to mention those. Basically upstream data looks a
> bit different for those lines, so the patch pattern also changes.

I am an upstream and Debian D-Bus maintainer, and the reporter of
CVE-2014-8156. If Sebastian's changes for jessie match the ones for
wheezy that are attached to #776617, then I confirm that they are
reasonable patterns to address CVE-2014-8156.

I do not know enough about fso to know whether they will cause fso
to regress (disallowing more than they should) or whether they are
sufficient to make fso *itself* secure against malicious local users
(which is probably not a supported use-case anyway), but they do stop
fso from making *other things* insecure.

In particular, nothing seems to be allowed that was not already allowed.

Regards,
    S


Reply to: