[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714355: marked as done (nmu: djview4_4.9-3)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:21:32 +0100
with message-id <20140122142132.GC4822@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714355: nmu: djview4_4.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #714355,
regarding nmu: djview4_4.9-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
714355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu djview4_4.9-3 . ALL . -m "unify libtiff dependency, thanks to Harald Jenny for noting the issue"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:43:51 +0100, intrigeri wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Julien Cristau wrote (30 Sep 2013 08:51:28 GMT) :
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:45:51 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> [...]
> >> nmu djview4_4.9-3 . ALL . -m "unify libtiff dependency, thanks to Harald Jenny for noting the issue"
> >> 
> > What does that mean?  What issue?
> 
> I see djview4 4.9-4+b1 is now in testing. Can this binnmu request be
> closed, then? If not, you'll surely want to answer the question
> Julien asked.
> 
Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: