Hello Adam, release team, Adam D. Barratt [2013-11-26 22:53 +0000]: > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 10:29 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Adam D. Barratt 2013-11-15 <ea713561bd4ba8b10305bba85e1e21cb@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> > > > On 2013-11-05 9:59, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > >*brown paper bag* Thanks for pointing out, signed and all uploaded > > > >now. > > > > > > All flagged for acceptance; thanks. > > > > A critical/annoying/bad replication bug was discovered in 9.1.10 (in > > s-p-u) that doesn't exist in 9.1.9 (in stable). 9.1.11 will be > > released on Dec 5th, so it would be a good idea if 9.1.10 wouldn't > > leave s-p-u until then. > > > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Nov2013ReplicationIssue > > Thanks for the note. There won't be a point release before that date, > but I guess we should get 9.1.11 in p-u as soon as feasible. :| Christoph already prepared 9.1.11/9.3.2 for unstable, I prepared squeeze (8.4.19) and wheezy (8.4.19/9.1.11) updates: http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/psql/squeeze/ http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/psql/wheezy/ It's going to be publicly announced at some point today, until then we should hold the uploads. But you can already review the updates. Same old story really, built/tested, upstream and p-common tests pass, no packaging/patch changes, full and filtered debdiffs available in above directories. OK to upload these once upstream sends out the announcement? Thank you, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature