Bug#670902: transition: hsqldb
tag 670902 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:39:13PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So I didn't see anywhere in this bug report a list of binary packages
> that go away and binary packages that replace them, and a description
> of how we figure out which packages are affected / need a rebuild / need
> a source upload. What did I miss?
There is no (java library) binary packages of hsqldb going away. It's
a "simple" hsqldb 1.8.0.10 -> hsqldb 2.2.9 version upgrade.
Because LO sticked a "I have 1.8" version sticker into their file format
and apparently needed HUGHE changed (abandoned afaics) to migrate to hsqldb 2.2.9
I assumed it would be a non-trivial transition.
#22 has the binary package list of everything affected (basically everything
Depends/Recommends/Suggests libhsqldb-java). Add libreoffice-base too and you're done.
LO will switch to libhsqldb1.8.0-java (see above), the rest does build
with hsqldb 2.2.9 at least. openjpa needs to be fixed (and be it by using
libhsqldb1.8.0-java, too)
I don't think there's a rebuild needed as the jar doesn't change:
rene@frodo:~/tmp/post-wheezy/4$ ls -l /usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Mär 19 14:38 /usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar -> hsqldb-1.8.0.10+dfsg.jar
rene@frodo:~/tmp/post-wheezy/4$ ls -l /sid/usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mär 18 22:42 /sid/usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar -> hsqldb-2.2.9.jar
So in the end it's not exactly a real or big transition anyway (except mabe
the switch to libhsqldb1.8.0-java) and I should have done this far earlier, yes...
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: