Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?

To: perezmeyer@gmail.com
Cc: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
From: Danny Smit <danny.smit.0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:02:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CACoz=-wugRgV6AwHfC0Pyz=NooXUGVOuZitz2vi_MrvR956P_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+QPbz0gNgWjOfm8XNZg1JWOTxkaxz1KKk=GntM_y1+THWFdqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CACoz=-ysx1MR8c6kVqadn88z=Tqk6Q-jufvLEW3w7BKiZSo5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CA+QPbz0gNgWjOfm8XNZg1JWOTxkaxz1KKk=GntM_y1+THWFdqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:51 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
<perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that the bug fixes must comply with stable's update rules.

What I've read in the documentation basically seems to mean: do it right.
Anything in particular that I should be aware of?

>> And is likely that my request for such backports will even get
>> accepted?
>
> If the commits are ok and it fulfills the stable release team criteria, is just a matter of any of us uploading it.

Thanks, I noticed Qt 5.7.1 in still the default/stable, but Qt 5.11 is
currently in testing and/or experimental. I assume that Qt 5.7.1 will
remain the default for the lifetime of stretch?

-- 
Regards,
Danny

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
  - From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>

References:
- Backport of Qt issue(s)?
  - From: Danny Smit <danny.smit.0@gmail.com>
- Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
  - From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
Next by Date: Processing of qtbase-opensource-src_5.11.2+dfsg-2_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
Next by thread: Re: Backport of Qt issue(s)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread