Bug#1035602: marked as done (tracker.debian.org parts of page not updating.)
Your message dated Tue, 9 May 2023 14:49:17 +0200
with message-id <ZFpBTTKFj+/HRNXT@t14-buxy.home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1035602: tracker.debian.org parts of page not updating.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035602,
regarding tracker.debian.org parts of page not updating.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1035602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: tracker.debian.org
The "news" on the tracker pages seems to be updating, but the information
on package versions does not. This is most noticable for new Packages
where the page still says "Package is gone" over a week after the
package was first uploaded.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-virtiofsd
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
On Sat, 06 May 2023, Peter Green wrote:
> The "news" on the tracker pages seems to be updating, but the information
> on package versions does not. This is most noticable for new Packages
> where the page still says "Package is gone" over a week after the
> package was first uploaded.
Indeed. Sorry for that, I had to reconfigure tracker.debian.org after the
removal of stretch... the update tasks were failing to find the stretch
repositories.
I should really get some notification system in place for non-transient
failures in tasks. :-|
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
--- End Message ---
Reply to: