Re: What to do with rosegarden and rosegarden2?
On Friday 26 May 2006 06:00, Andrew Pollock was like:
> rosegarden is just a meta-package that depends on rosegarden2 for
> transition purposes.
>
> rosegarden2 is also orphaned, and recommends (not in a package relationship
> kind of way) that people look at rosegarden4 instead.
>
> So I'm inclined to do an upload of rosegarden changing the maintainer and
> depending on rosegarden4,
Yes please.
> and an upload of rosegarden2, making it into a
> meta-package also, and depending on rosegarden4.
Is this for transitional purposes rather than dropping it completely? People
who have rosegarden2 installed may not want it upgraded to Rosegarden4.
I would just drop it, now that Rosegarden4 is stable.
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
We are the people We've been waiting for.
Reply to: