[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#954037: openwince-jtag: FTBFS against glibc 2.30



Package: openwince-jtag
Version: 0.5.1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu focal ubuntu-patch

Hi,

openwince-jtag FTBFS against glibc 2.30 in unstable due to the removal
of stropts.h.

In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:

  * d/p/glibc-2.30.patch: Fix FTBFS against glibc 2.30 by checking for
    existence of stropts.h.

Thanks for considering the patch.

Logan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers focal
  APT policy: (500, 'focal')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-14-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
diff -Nru openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/glibc-2.30.patch openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/glibc-2.30.patch
--- openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/glibc-2.30.patch	1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/glibc-2.30.patch	2020-03-15 20:39:50.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+--- a/src/tap/parport/ppdev.c
++++ b/src/tap/parport/ppdev.c
+@@ -28,7 +28,11 @@
+ #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_PPDEV_H
+ 
+ #include <fcntl.h>
++
++#ifdef HAVE_STROPTS_H
+ #include <stropts.h>
++#endif
++
+ #include <unistd.h>
+ #include <linux/ppdev.h>
+ #include <linux/ioctl.h>
diff -Nru openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/series openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/series
--- openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/series	2016-12-10 06:26:15.000000000 -0500
+++ openwince-jtag-0.5.1/debian/patches/series	2020-03-15 20:39:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 0.5.1-6.patch
 format-security.patch
+glibc-2.30.patch

Reply to: