Processed: is this really a bug in imgseek or?

To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Cc: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org> (imgseek for {527611})
Subject: Processed: is this really a bug in imgseek or?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 14:33:07 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.124179312922630.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200905081632.06340.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] 200905081632.06340.holger@layer-acht.org>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 527611 +squeeze
Bug#527611: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: squeeze

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#527611: is this really a bug in imgseek or?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#506703: new version (0.1.22) for amavis-stats
Next by Date: Bug#527611: is this really a bug in imgseek or?
Previous by thread: Bug#527611: is this really a bug in imgseek or?
Next by thread: Bug#527611: is this really a bug in imgseek or?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread