Re: Removing 4suite from Woody [Re: Please test new 4suite]
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 06:49, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
>
> | I'd be a bit reluctant to work on patches now, given the short
> | delay, since it would be difficult for people to test the patches
> | properly before Woody goes out,
>
> Don't be too sure of that. It was almost a year ago when we delayed
> discussion/implementation of a central pure-python module manager
> because woody was going to be released "soon". As it turned out,
> there was plenty of time to have completed that project, if it had
> been started. If you think that is the Right Solution (I've only
> half read the thread, I have no comments on it), then go ahead and
> start working on it now. It may or may not be included in woody, but
> it will be ready ASAP, and that's a Good Thing, IMO.
I personally think that it would be a similar amount of effort to fix up
xml.xslt and xml.xpath as it would to bring 4Suite 0.12.0 up to snuff.
D-Man's comment, and Bill Ellridge's comment on the 4Suite list make me
wonder whether we're rushing about in needless panic.
I suggest we continue with the tack of including latest PyXML and
4Suite, and yank them only if we really have to.
--
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
Fourthought, Inc.
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com http://Fourthought.com +1 720 320
2046
XML strategy, XML tools (http://4Suite.org), knowledge management
Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston):
http://www.xmlconference.com/
Latest article: Managing structured Web service metadata -
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsdlrdf/
Latest article: WSDL and the Wild, Wild West -
http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6004
Next presentation: XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML
Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: