On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 08:04:11PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes: > > > Below is a revised patch that puts the text into section 12.5 instead of > > here and simplifies the language a little. I think the major open > > question is how to handle the fact that it makes contrib and non-free > > packages instabuggy; this is a real chicken and egg sort of thing. I > > can see a few options: > > > > * Live with the instabuggy problem at the should level. I think this is fine. The bugs will be fixed in time, and there's no real hurry IMO. It's just something that would be good in the long run. If a package is only buggy in this respect, the bugs can (and will, I'm sure) be ignored for important things. > > Preferences? Comments? And if you agree with the first option, seconds? I second the proposed patch. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature