[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses



Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:

> Giacomo A Catenazzi <cate@debian.org> writes:
>
>> I think we should add also the license version in the first paragraph,
>> as is stated in the second part, not to confuse users.
>
>> +	  license, the GNU GPL (v. 2), the GNU LGPL (v. 2 and v. 2.1), and
>> the GNU FDL should refer
>> +	  to the corresponding files under
>
> Agreed.  Here's a new patch.  Note that this removes the unversioned
> licenses from the non-normative footnote; that's not a normative change
> yet, but I do want to discuss that separately under Bug#431109.

How about fixing the stylistic issue of saying 'For example, ..., and so
on.'?  Actually, the filenames doesn't strike me as examples at all.

How about 'In particular, /usr/..., respectively.' instead?  And make
sure the paths are given in the same order as the text.

Btw, the path to the LGPL v2.0 license is missing.

Thanks,
Simon

> --- orig/policy.sgml
> +++ mod/policy.sgml
> @@ -8653,21 +8653,18 @@
>  
>  	<p>
>  	  Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic
> -	  license, the GNU GPL, and the GNU LGPL, should refer to the
> +	  license, the GNU GPL (version 2), the GNU LGPL (versions 2 and
> +	  2.1), and the GNU FDL (version 1.2) should refer to the
>  	  corresponding files under
>  	  <file>/usr/share/common-licenses</file>,<footnote>
>              <p>
>                For example,
>                <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic</file>,
>                <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD</file>,
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL</file>,
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL</file>,
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>,
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2</file>, and
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1</file>, and so
> -              on. Note that the GFDL is new here, and the license file
> -              may not yet be in place in
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>. 
> +              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2</file>,
> +              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1</file>,
> +              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL-1.2</file>, and so
> +              on.
>              </p>
>            </footnote> rather than quoting them in the copyright
>  	  file. 
>
> -- 
> Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Reply to: