Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 07:39:20AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:19:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:"/srv/tftp" would be the right place, wouldn't it?I thought /srv was managed similar to /opt and /home so that it should not be filled with data from the package management system. I may be mistaken.
>Yes I seem to remember correctly.
>http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
From that url:
] However /srv should always exist on FHS compliant systems
] and should be used as the default location for such data.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Basically, the distro can put stuff there, but needs to respect the
admin's wishes. If the admin rm's it, mv's it, or whatever, that action
shouldn't get undone on a dist-upgrade. (If the admin does do any of
that, she'll need to change any config files that reference the location
too, of course)
Cheers, aj