[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: O: libapache-request-perl



My apologies for jumping the gun; you haven't responded to any bugs on
your package in almost a year; others had to NMU for the 1.0 version and
the Perl 5.8.0 transition, neither of which you acknowledged.  As the
package still has a maintainer I look forward to the 1.1 package. 
Thanks.

p.s. the crack is excellent, other than its tendancy to cause momentary
lapses in judgement, thanks for asking.

-- 
_ivan

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:37:11PM -0700, Ron wrote:
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> re:
> 
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > 
> > > Maintainer appears to be MIA - has not responded to bug reports on this
> > > package in almost one year.  
> > > 
> > > Orphaning this package so that someone active can take it over.  I will
> > > do so if no one else is interested.
> 
> I don't know what brand of crack they hand out in hijacking school
> these days, or much about this years fashion in diplomacy, but did
> you ever think of, uh, asking, before forcibly orphaning someone else's
> package or assuming things about them?
> 
> This package is perfectly functional in its current form and until your
> flurry of 'activity' it had a perfectly functional maintainer keeping it
> in the archive.  How do you think orphaning it and holding a fire sale
> improves on that when noone has ever asked to take it over?  There is a
> big difference between active and frantic.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:19:52PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Yup... The package seems quite simple - Ivan, do you want to take it? Do
> > you want me to take it? I just got approved into Debian and... Well, I
> > am not too busy with the little packages I have ;-)
> 
> Gunnar, I'd be delighted if you want to spend time on this package, I've
> no real use for it myself anymore, its completely trival, and gets
> about 5 emails a year.  Mainly it just needs a developer/user if its
> to stay up to date.  If you're a dd and you'd like to adopt it, you've
> got my blessing, I'll presume that unlike some you're still current
> with the protocol and know what to do.  If you'd like to just NMU and/or
> add yourself as comaintainer, I'm cool with that too.
> 
> Otherwise this package still has a maintainer, thanks for asking...
> 
>   Ron
> 
>   (waiting for the NM with enough insight and humor to request mia@d.o)
> 
> 

-- 
_ivan



Reply to: