Bug#975442: libetonyek: FTBFS against boost_1.74
Package: libetonyek
Version: 0.1.9-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+boost@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most relevant
part is probably this:
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DBOOST_SPIRIT_USE_PHOENIX_V3 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DLIBETONYEK_BUILD -I../../inc -I../../src/lib/contexts -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/mdds-1.5 -I/usr/include/librevenge-0.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DNDEBUG -DLIBETONYEK_VISIBILITY -fvisibility=hidden -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -Wextra -Wshadow -pedantic -Weffc++ -c NUMCollector.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libetonyek_internal_la-NUMCollector.o
NUM3Parser.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool libetonyek::NUM3Parser::parseDocument()’:
NUM3Parser.cpp:46:8: error: ‘for_each’ is not a member of ‘std’
46 | std::for_each(sheetListRefs.begin(), sheetListRefs.end(), std::bind(&NUM3Parser::parseSheet, this, std::placeholders::_1));
| ^~~~~~~~
It is planned to push boost_1.74 as the default version in Debian/Bullseye.
[1] http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/10/27-boost/boost/libetonyek_0.1.9-3_unstable_boost.log
Best regards
Anton
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=kZRS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: