[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: suspicious dependency requirement of new backported libreoffice version



On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, rene@debian.org wrote:

> > It's said that such requirement (">") is likely to be a mistake. Is
> > this a problem?
> 
> No, it's not.

It normally is, you use either ">=" or ">>".

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)


Reply to: