Bug#824800: hunspell-es: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/hunspell/es_ES.aff
On 2016-05-19 23:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> The question is: shouldn't the update have tried to update both? Do we
> actually try support partial upgrades?
Even if a "regular" upgrade would upgrade both packages, there is no
guarantee on ordering. So I'm trying to exercise worst-case upgrade
paths that are valid (i.e. not violating package relationships).
I'm not even sure that this falls under "partial" upgrade. If myspell-es
would get removed from testing (it has no rdepends), this bug (in
huspell-es) would get more exposure.
Andreas
Reply to: