Bug#265741: marked as done (openoffice.org: Disabling CUPS support using SAL_DISABLE_CUPS=1 is not documented)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:02:48 -0400
with message-id <E1C5OZc-0005bq-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#265741: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.2-3+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2004 17:46:30 +0000
>From christoph_claus@web.de Sat Aug 14 10:46:30 2004
Return-path: <christoph_claus@web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bw2bt-0000ko-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:46:29 -0700
Received: from [80.145.48.167] (helo=karlchen)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1Bw2bO-0003hn-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:45:58 +0200
Received: from chr by karlchen with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bw2bM-0007NJ-MX; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:45:56 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christoph Claus <christoph_claus@web.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: openoffice.org: native CUPS support is a regression and buggy
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:45:56 +0200
Message-Id: <E1Bw2bM-0007NJ-MX@karlchen>
Sender: christoph_claus@web.de
X-Sender: christoph_claus@web.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
openoffice.org's native support for cups is well meant, but buggy:
printers which aren't available every time oo.o starts (e.g. remote
cups-autodetected printing host turned off sometimes, laptop-net
reconfiguring cups) confuse oo.o. I have to manually remove
~/.openoffice/1.1.2/user/psprint/psprint.conf to make work again.
I'd like to use a printing wrapper such as xpp or kprinter, those can cope
with this situation. openoffice is the only program i know of which doesn't
even allow to use a alternative print command. Besides it violates the
unix philosophy of doing one thing and doing that well and it inhibits
integration into desktop environments like KDE.
I set importance high because I'm unable to print without special action,
which does severly decrease the usability of an office suite.
I may be a bit rude, please excuse me. I just don't understand why it's
necessary to give up a working, but ugly solution (oopadmin or config file)
for a partly (and in my case not at all) working nice solution.
Please add back the possibility to use alternative printing commands.
Thanks a lot for your otherwise very good work.
Christoph
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (950, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.22.30.1 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.2-2 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.2-2+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-de [openo 1.1.2-2 German language package for OpenOf
ii ttf-opensymbol 1.1.2-2 The OpenSymbol TrueType font
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBHk/UaGV06Oue67oRAluzAKCajYLGKvpZDMr334yzFDED0xT03QCeIyTS
E4dKTKDkGTWCqPtHn8T8iCA=
=1SC9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265741-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 13:28:02 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 09 06:28:02 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C5Oy2-0002MZ-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 06:28:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C5OZc-0005bq-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:02:48 -0400
From: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
To: 265741-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#265741: fixed in openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.2-3+2
Message-Id: <E1C5OZc-0005bq-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:02:48 -0400
Delivered-To: 265741-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: openoffice.org-debian-files
Source-Version: 1.1.2-3+2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org-debian-files, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.dsc
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.dsc
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.tar.gz
openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2_all.deb
to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-debian-files/openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 265741@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Halls <halls@debian.org> (supplier of updated openoffice.org-debian-files package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:35:40 +0200
Source: openoffice.org-debian-files
Binary: openoffice.org-debian-files
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-3+2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Halls <halls@debian.org>
Description:
openoffice.org-debian-files - Debian specific parts of OpenOffice.org
Closes: 253071 265741
Changes:
openoffice.org-debian-files (1.1.2-3+2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Urgency medium to help people who are having problems with native CUPS
support
* README.Debian:
- Document native CUPS support and explain how to turn it off
using (closes: #253071, #265741)
- Drop statement about removed LZW support for .GIFs - the patent has
expired
- Add a note that the fontconfig integration is not included in Woody
backports
* Document SAL_DISABLE_CUPS in openoffice(1) man page
* etc/openoffice/openoffice.conf:Add SAL_DISABLE_CUPS variable, commented
out.
* Source /etc/openoffice/openoffice.conf in spadmin wrapper script, to
allow CUPS support to be disabled too.
Files:
fcc7f7455dee84e5c83667a1ed9e5e95 713 editors optional openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.dsc
32da634a95ff99c15678756897de4526 27724 editors optional openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2.tar.gz
38660a1aae9ee86f0402a60f9e1ce036 31844 editors optional openoffice.org-debian-files_1.1.2-3+2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBQFAmexmdExmX588RAkEtAJ91r8B7b2X2LRMW1HN5iOPNTL5eqgCfZCBV
2GXi9Cuaff5PRgXMK86vM54=
=dtO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: