Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:52:23 +0100 with message-id <20091103075223.GC9652@atlan> and subject line Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#553820: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #553820, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 553820: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:10:25 +0100 (MET)
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200911020110.nA21APxh011156@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Package: octave3.2 Version: 3.2.3-1 Severity: important User: doko@debian.org Usertags: readline6 Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Cc: 553820-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#553820: replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev
- From: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:52:23 +0100
- Message-id: <20091103075223.GC9652@atlan>
- In-reply-to: <4AEF7046.6090703@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 200911020110.nA21APxh011156@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de> <[🔎] 20091102210953.GB7509@atlan> <4AEF7046.6090703@debian.org>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:50:30AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02.11.2009 22:09, Thomas Weber wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 02:10:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Package: octave3.2 >>> Version: 3.2.3-1 >>> Severity: important >>> User: doko@debian.org >>> Usertags: readline6 >>> >>> Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html >>> As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. >>> >>> Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available >>> in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev >>> build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the >>> libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update. >> >> I followed Manoj's proposal at >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00562.html, namely >> libreadline-dev | libreadline6-dev | libreadline5-dev >> >> Is this acceptable? > > sounds fine. > > Thanks, Matthias In that case, I'm closing the bug. The above is already in the current unstable package. Thanks for working on this. Thomas
--- End Message ---