Bug#956005: marked as done (transition page checkbox labels are not marked as such)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jan 2021 21:18:46 +0000
with message-id <E1l1FRe-000IQF-Ny@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#956005: fixed in ben 0.9.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #956005,
regarding transition page checkbox labels are not marked as such
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
956005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition page checkbox labels are not marked as such
- From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:25:08 +0100
- Message-id: <87pncltt0r.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org>
Package: ben
Verison: 0.9.0
Severity: minor
Marking up the labels for the status filter checkboxes on the transition
details page with <label> tags would make them easier to toggle, since
that makes the whole label clickable, not just the checkbox. It also
makes them more accessible to assistive technology users.
For example:
<input type="checkbox" id="good"><label for="good">good</label>
See <https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/forms/labels/> for more details.
Thanks,
- ilmari
--
- Twitter seems more influential [than blogs] in the 'gets reported in
the mainstream press' sense at least. - Matt McLeod
- That'd be because the content of a tweet is easier to condense down
to a mainstream media article. - Calle Dybedahl
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ben
Source-Version: 0.9.2
Done: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ben, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 956005@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org> (supplier of updated ben package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 21:44:44 +0100
Source: ben
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@debian.org>
Closes: 876966 956005
Changes:
ben (0.9.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Set status filters via URL parameters (Closes: #876966)
* Use Tyxml.Html.txt instead of Tyxml.Html.pcdata as the latter is deprecated
* Avoid deleting lock file when it exists
* Add <label> tags to make filters easier to toggle (Closes: #956005)
Checksums-Sha1:
5641b4965791ecdea7bb3cf0b9a913f33b8e0173 2114 ben_0.9.2.dsc
2362a7288bc44609fc782239a608091d6dad591d 79228 ben_0.9.2.tar.xz
3955fb83d20e1a3dc729aab3b92c7f231a918fbb 9623 ben_0.9.2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
bd87bedebb91d1edfb5d4b2b2fe8d7a40e8336d3501860b9266eff56d46c4ba8 2114 ben_0.9.2.dsc
a2a27d375bd1386e072b72afcbe245cc1d04c23ffb99260bd16597cf8aad1330 79228 ben_0.9.2.tar.xz
892748b8537985cd573c23b2c35996f689deab1f59df5930538545e45c74aa74 9623 ben_0.9.2_source.buildinfo
Files:
9a06ee1499466c90e90d4ee191761e1a 2114 devel optional ben_0.9.2.dsc
9297c7979165a8e310c10b0c66130027 79228 devel optional ben_0.9.2.tar.xz
f70d5739cb959bf4fca20bc6b54a4be3 9623 devel optional ben_0.9.2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJFBAEBCAAvFiEE/IeFmw45V03XKU7GPfRgADmhQMQFAmAEpOoRHG1laGRpQGRl
Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQPfRgADmhQMTy9w//byxOvnjAoUyguuq0dvEw4qOG0kEQDxj0
D34e8TRQoKSjj+tqbVH5t7GHsF5/Vra/D71NaLDgu8O4dbMfXVf6vGTI7GinowPM
U/4wh+r6AQN2U1jyTiRUKqvev2GKq2TAY5+wqPsdjn+XdgLMf5pv9R5LDfPxGiCH
XPnH+JrjSj6lrEqUGbC6mW2veTKnbeTSHginjZuJHeS6ZnXGQe6A9HL0NZaiOtVx
06htxtX/FADXbn5Mjf5A/LPzn+4Fz7a/Yo/1Nht9rKzw7vyAnVzXroQVbwLU5gQZ
1FSQZF5FkFj78vukcvCqPtkKThoYBVgNHVXGZ72eTGmgIxGgoOO/NSdhFyS+0sMP
sbxgLVs4FDcivw8ycYZMxFyveljeBYwkkidHL/EYhBbj7Mec/jrnEao4X6bmTbl8
PCa5K18e6DsOV3OM7jFxK3JaRL2aea6AQy6AaWc4rT46rYdjmOmGwuxG3V590T98
xyF4Flsm8pOnL86rqH7APvSCPR3UvvY0wvVCJ9vSd993O/l7Ly0KGqHAWG3ysqCP
M2IsIPldSf3HSWC7GlynJzuA/m4IrR1v/d62yg5pxTRRrAb+jbHbe9yDnvidC3Mk
myz34PRNMPvi9ElMbUAk9H7NNPslxPAtjr7Jqebsa9nNGHmeIECaModO+9vhLEIu
QURvrtwkyB4=
=XvKW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: