Re: ocaml 3.08.3 upload in progress ...
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:55:26PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> | Anyway, the plan is as follows :
> |
> | 1) i upload ocaml 3.08.3-1, we wait until all or most autobuilders have
> | catched it up.
> |
> | 2) then we upload all level 1 dependencies (those that depend or build
> | depend only on ocaml 3.08.3). We wait for them to be autobuilt.
> Cool, looks good. A couple of questions..
>
> It looks like ocaml was successfully built on all archs now. Do you
> know a good way to tell if they binaries have been installed for use in
> the buildd chroots(ie: how long to wait until we start the next level)?
I would wait until tomorrow at least, since hppa was built post-dinstall run
yesterday, and not be installed on the archive. Notice that the slowest arches
where mips and hppa, all others completed in the first 5 hours following the
upload or so. m68k followed the i386 build by less than 4 hours.
I don't know though if it is enough to have the packages in the archive, or if
they have also to be manually installed or something for some arches, but i
don't think so.
So i guess we can build the next round starting today evening after dinstall
(usually around 20-21 hour european time), I would refrain from uploading huge
packages at first, to make sure they don't stall the autobuilders while the
smaller ones are getting through it, altough i guess this means coq only, not
sure.
As for me, i will upload today :
camlzip, lablgl, spamoracle, ledit, mlgtk.
> Since Samuel's ordering script has us at 5 levels, even if we waited a
> full day, that's still < 1 week.
I guess that the first level, only ocaml really needs to be uploaded, since it
shows :
upload: tuareg-mode
upload: ocaml-doc
upload: ocaml
upload: hevea-doc
upload: coq-doc
I ask you to check individual packages during the adaptation for problems
though.
Also, there are some packages smimou's script did miss, and i will go through
the uploaded Sources and Packages file soon to extract them in a couple of
day, but please post them here if you meet any such packages.
But indeed, it will probably be built in a week or two if we do it right.
> We should probably coordinate who uploads which package(at least for the
> group maintained one). Perhaps just announce on IRC in #d-o-m?
I think most of them have a primary maintainer who will do the uploads.
> Should the uploads be urgency medium as well?
Yep, that would probably be best.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: