On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:30:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > - gmetadom (out of date on i386) > Am currently building it. Thanks, I've seen the upload. > Already pinged Bastian Blank, but you can ask debian-s390 if you want. Done. > But we have a worse problem, look at : > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=liblablgtkmathview-ocaml-dev > And you will see that we picked up a dependency on atk1.0 which is 3/10. It doesn't seem to me that troublesome ... the funny thing is that is a dependencies caught by dh_shlibdeps and gtkmathview has probably no need to use the latest atk version, anyway ... > Maybe we could ask for the removal of gtkmathview and lablgtkmathview > from testing, and they will enter again in 7 days, or just wait one No, sorry, but an additional week it doesn't seems a good enough reason to ask for the removal of a package from testing. I also think thas a similar objection will be raised by the testing guys ... > more week. Your call Stefano, altough i would favor the removal > myself, so we can go forward. Is anyone waiting for any important upload here? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature