Re: Bug#205552: jack-audio-connection-kit: new upstream release available
- To: debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org, Robert Jordens <robertjo@phys.ethz.ch>
- Cc: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>, guenter geiger <geiger@xdv.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#205552: jack-audio-connection-kit: new upstream release available
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:01:06 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87n0e1onhp.wl@netfort.gr.jp>
- In-reply-to: <20030821071316.GC3719@schuh>
- References: <20030819162936.GD22282@schuh> <Pine.LNX.4.31.0308191844120.32575-100000@xdv.org> <20030819193130.GG22282@schuh> <87n0e4307e.wl@netfort.gr.jp> <20030820143342.GM22282@schuh> <87ada4l65b.wl@netfort.gr.jp> <20030820151558.GO22282@schuh> <87ada3vhgr.wl@netfort.gr.jp> <20030821071316.GC3719@schuh>
>
> As I said: Jack does not get in because that applications that use it
> need the glibc bugs and gcc bugs fixed. So you would have to remove
> _all_ jack applications from testing to let jack in because the ones in
> testing break if the old jack library disappears and the new
> applications break because they need a newer glibc. That wouldn't help.
> You can't force jack in.
I'm rather convinced that there should be a new version.
I'm moving this discussion to multimedia, but I think most of this is
summed up now
[New Version of Jack to hit unstable]
The new version of Jack 0.75 will be uploaded RSN.
They are binary-compatible (modulo bugs).
We won't wait for 0.71.2 to enter testing before uploading, since we
probably need a bit more time before other things like glibc to hit testing,
and applications are requiring bugfixes provided by later jack.
The new version of jack library will be called libjack0.71.2-0
(although it is of version 0.75.0-1)
The upstream is still experimenting with what soname to put for jack,
and they will be putting a different soname to ours.
We shall resync with what the upstream is giving for the soname when they
release jack 1.0.
[Maintainers]
The new maintainer for 'jack' is:
Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Robert Jordens <robertjo@phys.ethz.ch>
guenter geiger <geiger@xdv.org>
Instead of one (myself), since jack is an important part of Debian multimedia
that more activity is benefitial.
regards,
junichi
Reply to: