On Sun 16 Dec 2012 09:03:14 Paul Wise escribió: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > > Is that a real problem, from a Debian point of view? Aren't we entering > > a phase of multiple display management choices anyway, with Wayland > > coming along? I would have thought that direct framebuffer access, with > > a complementary window management model, was an equally valid choice as > > using either X or Wayland. > > For Debian thats fine, for me personally there are too many apps and > toolkits that don't support anything other than X11. GTK+ for instance > has dropped DirectFB support. In the case of Qt4, and if I'm not mistaken, frambebuffer support would mean a parallel build of Qt. Doesn't sounds too promising :-/ -- "Los promotores del software privativo demonizan algo tan básico y ético como el hecho de compartir imponiendo términos como el de 'pirata'. Equiparan ayudar al prójimo con atacar barcos. Cuando me preguntan qué pienso de la piratería musical e informática digo que atacar barcos es muy malo y, que yo sepa, los piratas no usan computadoras.” Richard Stallman, 05/11/2008, anexo de la Cámara de Diputados, Argentina Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.