Bug#1058914: RFS: budgie-session/0.9-1 [ITP] -- Budgie Session Manager
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-session":
* Package name : budgie-session
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream contact : Budgie Developers <admin@buddiesofbudgie.org>
* URL : https://github.com/buddiesofbudgie/budgie-session
* License : GPL-2+
* Vcs : https://github.com/ubuntubudgie/budgie-session/tree/debian
Section : misc
The source builds the following binary packages:
budgie-session - Budgie Session Manager
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/budgie-session/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-session/budgie-session_0.9-1.dsc
More Information
budgie-session is based upon the v44 version of gnome-session package in Debian.
It inherits Debian's existing packaging. The existing d/copyright has
been completely reworked since the existing gnome-session package is
based on an old debian template (I think) and the copyright owners was
not complete. The new gnome-session for GNOME 46 due in the new year
(2024) includes changes that are incompatible with the current
iteration of budgie-desktop. The effort to expend to make
budgie-desktop compatible with it is (from an upstream POV) to be
diverted with upcoming budgie-desktop changes.
budgie-session is part of budgie-desktop's restructuring from its
GNOME based roots to a more independent project structure. In the
future budgie-session will evolve to support the new Wayland only
version of budgie-desktop.
Assuming this package is acceptable to Debian I (as Debian Maintainer)
will upload a revised budgie-desktop package that utilises
budgie-session to enable full end-user testing.
This sbuilds against unstable and is lintian free.
Changes for the initial release:
budgie-session (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial Release (Closes: #1058891)
Regards,
--
David Mohammed
Reply to: