Hello, On Fri 03 Nov 2023 at 05:01pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > I thought mentioning dropping Built-Using from arch:all package could be > an acceptable reason, which in turn also follows Lintian's suggestion :) > But do let me know if I should further clarify. But why couldn't an arch:all package have Built-Using? Built-Using, per Policy, is for license issues. arch:any vs. arch:all isn't determinative. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature