Re: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 22:44, Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 7/29/22 5:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Still a couple of Lintian warnings to fix, then you can finalize the
> > changelog and I'll upload:
> >
> > I: pacman-package-manager source: duplicate-long-description libalpm-dev libalpm13 [debian/control]
> > I: libalpm-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
> Fixed
>
> > I: libalpm13: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
> There's not really much more information to say on libalpm; I don't know
> what else to put in the description without making it a word salad.
>
> > I: libalpm13: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/libalpm/hooks/]
> > I: makepkg: package-contains-empty-directory [usr/share/makepkg-template/]
>
> Fixed
>
> > This one doesn't need to be fixed in the package, just send a patch
> > upstream and it can be picked up in the next version:
> >
> > I: pacman-package-manager: typo-in-manual-page "allows to" "allows one to" [usr/share/man/man8/pacman.8.gz:264]
>
> Sent the patch upstream.
>
> I didn't even know about these Lintian tags since lintian by default
> only shows warnings and above (these are info tags). I've updated my
> machine's Lintian config to show me everything, even down to pedantic.
> My (minor) changes have been pushed to Salsa and Mentors.
Looks good, uploaded.
Reply to: