[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]






>The new version appears to work for me.
Thanks very much for testing it again. 

>By the way, do you happen to know if terminology is supposed to replace
>eterm, or are both going to live together?
 They are certainly not the same thing, i'll simply put in the lead enlightenment devs response to someone else from the irc channel yesterday:

Jul 14 03:36:25 
<bunjiboys> Hi, after a reinstall of my Debian box, I am no longer able to get Eterm working. When i try to start it, it opens the window just fine, but it never opens the shell. I tried settings different commands to run using the -e switch to change what to execute, but it seems like it never gets to that point. After running with both strace and --debug it looks like it is stuck in a loop trying to read a socket (/tmp/.X11-unix/X0). Strace output: https://bunjiboys
<raster> bunjiboys: no idea
<raster> i havent used eterm for over a decade
<raster> also note - thats the socket use to ttalk to x
<raster> so its talking to x all day
<raster> thats how you draw or get input
<raster> i use terminology
<raster> it's actively developed
<raster> and uses modern efl
<raster> eterm does not
<bunjiboys> I was hoping not to have to change terms, been using Eterm for well over a decade now, just so used to it :)
<raster> then get used to it not working
<raster> or fix it yoursefl
<raster> thats the activity on it
<raster> one commit in march
<raster> another janruary last year
<raster> anoither in 2012
<raster> etc.
<raster> not very active
<bunjiboys> yeah, guess I do need to start shopping around for alternatives
<cippp> for sure you will like terminology
<raster> terminology is a far cry from eterm
<raster> it is pretty different
<raster> on the fancy-side it does a whole host more
<bunjiboys> well, i didnt really use most of the features of Eterm, I disabled all the UI stuff and so on, its probably more an "Ive always used it, so Ill keep using it" thing
<bunjiboys> Although, having been working on OSX recently, I wouldnt mind something that comes a little closer to iTerm2
<raster> well then... you'll be needing to do your own debugging
<raster> as such enlightenment has moved on
<raster> we build on efl
<raster> (our libs)
<raster> eterm does not
<raster> it is effectively not part of enlightenment as a project anymore
<raster> it's legacy we don't work on, support etc.
<raster> it doesn't use our library infra
<raster> and doesn't even visually fit in
<bunjiboys> my point was that I'm not against finding something else, just never looked
<raster> sure
<raster> just saying that if you don't move - you're not going to get any help here
<raster> terminology is the "e terminal"
<raster> it uses efl
<raster> it's modern

Reply to: