Re: Debian policy, a problem or a misunderstand ?
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian policy, a problem or a misunderstand ?
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:44:55 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 873ai6vnt4.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <48F9DF59.1000900@kalinowski.com.br> (Eduardo M. KALINOWSKI's message of "Sat\, 18 Oct 2008 10\:06\:33 -0300")
- References: <48F97142.20902@gmail.com> <87k5c68ewm.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <48F9DF59.1000900@kalinowski.com.br>
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> writes:
> They are confusing indeed. It would be better if it was written "...
> that they exit with a zero return status if everything went well."
>
> Comments, your could a wishlist bug be filled suggesting this wording
> change?
No need, I just changed this in Policy's Git repository. It will be in
the next release.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: