Re: RFS: unicornscan

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: unicornscan
From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:13:16 +0200
Message-id: <200712132313.16485.danchev@spnet.net>
In-reply-to: <200712132119.54167.hans.ullrich@loop.de>
References: <200712131322.06582.hans.ullrich@loop.de> <200712132112.51124.danchev@spnet.net> <200712132119.54167.hans.ullrich@loop.de>

On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
--cut--
> there is no special reason for this field. I set this to amd64, because I
> have only amd64-architecture available. I am sure, it can also be built on
> i386.

Your amd64 with be fine with arch: any.

> You may change this field, or I will in the next version.

Sure, I can. By the way, lintian emits quite important warnings which should 
be addressed as well.

I hope you will find a sponsor.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB

Reply to:

References:
- RFS: unicornscan
  - From: "Hans-J. Ullrich" <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
- Re: RFS: unicornscan
  - From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: RFS: unicornscan
  - From: "Hans-J. Ullrich" <hans.ullrich@loop.de>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: unicornscan
Next by Date: Re: Removing parts of upstream tar-ball, parsers, autobuilding
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: unicornscan
Next by thread: Re: RFS: unicornscan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread