Re: Main, contrib or non-free?
Matt Zimmerman:
> If the program cannot be compiled using free tools, then it is not very
> free.
Well, that's a matter of definition.
I'll have a look at using another cross-assembler. Fortunately, there
seems to be a GPL'ed 6502 cross-assembler, so I'll have a look into
using that one instead.
> and requiring proprietary software for modification restricts that
> freedom.
It doesn't *require* proprietary software. The problem was that I
hadn't found a DFSG free 6502 cross-assembler (obviously didn't look
too far). Now that I found one, the point seems moot.
--
\\//
Peter - I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
Reply to: