Hi Maarten, Nevermind the below, it looks like I read the diff the wrong way around: > 1. The two following files have been introduced in version 5.2 > and would need dedicated entries in d/copyright since they > declare being licensed under Boost Software License 1.0 > (careful not to make a single paragraph, as copyright > holders are not exactly the same, although a concatenation > of holders of both files may be tolerable): > > cmake/GetGitRevisionDescription.cmake > cmake/GetGitRevisionDescription.cmake.in > > 2. The holder of the following file went back in time in 2021, > but the stamp in d/copyright doesn't go as far in the past: > > cmake/VersionString.cmake > > Reading further, these go as far as 2020: > > include/cif++/pdb/pdb2cif.hpp > include/cif++/utilities.hpp > src/pdb/pdb2cif_remark_3.hpp > > So it might be worth extending the range of dates for all > files to 2020-2023 to be on the safe side in my opinion. I will let things rest a bit for now, and will redo the review again later when I will be better focused. In the meantime, this request is open for review. Sorry for the confusion, -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/4, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Marillion - Estonia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature