[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1012608: ITP: manim-ce -- Animation engine for explanatory math videos



Hi Timo,

I do maintain many packages whose dependencies are in different teams.
IMHO manim is the right fit for math team and it's python deps can lie in python team for maintainence.

From a blend pov I think it's a better fit here but ofc, it's your call where you'd like seeing it since you're the potential maintainer :)

Best,
Nilesh

On 11 June 2022 3:10:53 am IST, "Timo Röhling" <roehling@debian.org> wrote:
Hi Nilesh,

* Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> [2022-06-10 19:46]:
One quick question: since it's a math based package, could you
consider maintaining it in the math-team umbrella instead?
Happy to see the Math Team take an interest! However, Manim has an
extensive list of (non-math) Python dependencies, so in the interest
of smooth updates, the Python Team should better be involved in
its maintenance.

I suggest we put one team as Maintainer and the other as additional
uploader; Salsa can easily grant push access to both teams, and the
package will also show up on both Team package overviews.

I am leaning towards the Python Team as primary maintainer, as I
expect to encounter more Python issues than math issues, but I am
open to arguments why the Math Team is a better fit. ;)


Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Reply to: