Re: about shell scripts having X>&Y in place of X&>Y

To: Patrice Duroux <patrice.duroux@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org, debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: about shell scripts having X>&Y in place of X&>Y
From: James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:05:48 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] CALDQ5NyhQB_6ryxUPGU4q73ub6No8_wJz_8Qwr+gmjE2BmJEzA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAGKjw9+mMn3DgFigOhUwVR_TOQtOcjbp76jz-6hvyVR73-qLUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALDQ5NwER4gPgoF=xZjJN3BFR8hOuki6_gRhgoGv2ioic6Ngcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGKjw9+mMn3DgFigOhUwVR_TOQtOcjbp76jz-6hvyVR73-qLUw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 15:53, Patrice Duroux <patrice.duroux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Great, I will give a look at shellcheck.

Thanks - if it can also detect these problems, then -- after waiting a
little while for any suggestions and confirmation from
debian-lint-maint (cc'd) -- it might be worth filing a bug against
lintian to request a shellscript style-checking rule (idea: solve
once, and then attempt to introduce automated checks to highlight
future occurrences).

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: about shell scripts having X>&Y in place of X&>Y
  - From: Patrice Duroux <patrice.duroux@gmail.com>

Next by Date: Re: about shell scripts having X>&Y in place of X&>Y
Next by thread: Re: about shell scripts having X>&Y in place of X&>Y
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread