[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#745152: lintian: missing source / prebuilt-javascript-object deployJava.js



Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> writes:

> Le 18 avr. 2014 15:51, "Felix Natter" <fnatter@gmx.net> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 2.5.22.1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> my Freeplane package (draft for new upstream version here:
>> https://github.com/fnatter/freeplane-debian/) includes deployJava.js for
>> the applet export (in order to avoid network access to
>> 'http://www.java.com/js/deployJava.js' for _local_ applets).
>>
>> Now I get these two lintians:
>>
>> E: freeplane source: source-is-missing freeplane/resources/html/deployJava.js
>> P: freeplane source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object freeplane/resources/html/
> deployJava.js mean line length is about 15764 characters
>>
>> Next I included the source (BSD-3-clause license):
>>   https://github.com/fnatter/freeplane-debian/blob/master/freeplane/resources/html/deployJava.txt
>> in the same directory as deployJava.js:
>>   https://github.com/fnatter/freeplane-debian/blob/master/freeplane/resources/html/deployJava.js
>>
>> --> is lintian looking for "deployJava.txt" as source of "deployJava.js"?
>> (deployJava.txt seems to be a common name for this:
>> http://www.java.com/js/deployJava.txt)
>>
>> (I'd like to avoid putting it into debian/missing-sources because it's
>> already in freeplane/resources/html)

hi Bastien,

> Will add needed code. Thanks d'or thé bug report.

Ok, thanks for the quick reply and action :-)

> Btw does deployjava is already packaged?

I don't think so, and I hesitate to package it separately because I
would have to create that package and patch freeplane :-/

> Bastien
>>
>> --> Can we suppress the 'source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object' warning
>> for "deployJava.js" or shall I override it?

Concerning this: Shall I add an override or does your lintian code
change take this into account?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter


Reply to: