Re: increasing default lintian verbosity? [ping: Jordà Polo]
On 2012-01-23 13:15, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:04 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> On a related note, I plotted (part of) the data[1] we got on
>> debian-rules-missing-recommended-target tag[2]. The huge increase of
>> affected packages in the start can most likely be attributed to this full-run[3].
>>
>> The second "spike" (around 11/12/01) could be due to reporting now
>> handling multiple versions of the same source packages, but I did not
>> confirm this guess.
>
> Interesting, I didn't know you kept historical stats about tags, would
> it be possible to have graphs of those and the other stats you keep?
We have data back from about 2011-09-03[1], but for now we are just
collecting it. Allegedly there is some untested code somewhere to graph
it... speaking of which, Jordà: are there any news on this? Feel free
to push a branch or something if you do not have time to finish it.
> Something using rrdtool might be interesting.
>
By the looks of it, the data was designed for use with gnuplot[2].
I also just noticed that the first ~14 of entries are slightly broken in
the main stat file[3]. A new column appears just before the last one -
I suspect that one is my fault and was caused when I added pedantic tags
to lintian.d.o[4].
~Niels
[1] That is the first entry in the stats file.
Also, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/09/msg00010.html
[2]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f62677d3742a1eb4823d390d7a4f13a38fd0a67
[3]
1316348790 2.5.3 2153 12930 19532 92 3942 74876 107395 34755 24800
1316360896 2.5.3 2212 15178 26198 92 3942 74876 107395 34755 40991 24800
[4] More precisely:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2083db39003356ab7502f9d50773015548a96fb
Reply to: