Re: GSoC status: final summary and comments
Jordà Polo <jorda@ettin.org> writes:
> Then manpages and URLs probably need be classified too, which makes
> sense. But how about manuals that are seldom referenced? Where do we
> draw the line? This is the number of references for each manual:
>
> 215 policy
> 27 devref
> 18 doc-base
> 13 fhs
> 13 menu
> 4 debconf-spec
> 4 menu-policy
> 4 perl-policy
> 2 python-policy
> 1 libpkg-guide
> 1 lintian
>
> The first five manuals probably deserve to be identified as a "source",
> but I'm not so sure about manuals with 4 or less references.
Maybe we should make a source classifier called other-policies and group
together everything with fewer than 10 references until someone requests
we split out one of them in particular?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: