[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#1057843: (no subject)
To
:
1057843@bugs.debian.org
Subject
: Bug#1057843: (no subject)
From
:
deb-bug.jcm0sqbgmxhx4jazzrb83ah3@qmail.sunbirdgrove.com
Date
: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:36:53 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
dfe2930a-45cd-b203-bfda-2726812b3f8c@qmail.sunbirdgrove.com
>
Reply-to
:
deb-bug.jcm0sqbgmxhx4jazzrb83ah3@qmail.sunbirdgrove.com
,
1057843@bugs.debian.org
References
: <
[🔎]
170213085751.880636.15744973723197230632.reportbug@eldamar.lan
>
Would an fsck even be able to recognize corruption, if metadata were
unaffected? Without file checksumming, can it discern?
Reply to:
debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
deb-bug . jcm0sqbgmxhx4jazzrb83ah3 (on-list)
deb-bug . jcm0sqbgmxhx4jazzrb83ah3 (off-list)
References
:
Bug#1057843: linux: ext4 data corruption in 6.1.64-1
From:
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Processing of linux_6.1.67-1_source.changes
Next by Date:
linux_6.1.67-1_source.changes is NEW
Previous by thread:
Bug#1057843: linux: ext4 data corruption in 6.1.64-1
Next by thread:
Bug#1057843: (no subject)
Index(es):
Date
Thread