Re: DNS servers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 15:34, Russell Coker wrote:
> So this leaves DNS caching as the only reason for BIND. Is there a DNS
> server that does caching better than BIND?
djbdns/tinydns IS faster, but problem i had with it are the distribution
policy and there is no support for CIDR. I want to restrict recursion to
networks smaller/bigger then /24. /16 etc.
there is also
pdnsd - http://home.t-online.de/home/Moestl/
and
dnrd http://dnrd.nevalabs.org/
but there are meant for personal use. I don't know if they would handle the
load.
- --
"We should not be trying to use technical solutions
to solve a social problem."
[Thomas R. Stephenson ("about SPAM" - Pegasus list 16.12.1999)]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92lmnEyTmlrVpUvwRAh+OAJ0Tmp1dRC7C4fS4msITkPrlsDF2aQCfbTcm
RtDAngCCI6eI+SyX+tig0XI=
=wxgA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: