Re: any chance to improve maintainership of htcondor package in Debian?
<debian-hpc@lists.debian.org>
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [htcondor-admin #108007] any chance to improve maintainership of
htcondor package in Debian?
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.0.12-16521-1673387872-1615.108007-6-0@>
X-URL: http://www.onerussian.com
X-Image-Url: http://www.onerussian.com/img/yoh.png
X-PGP-Key: http://www.onerussian.com/gpg-yoh.asc
X-fingerprint: C5B9 05F0 E8D9 FD96 68FF 366F A2DE 2350 62DA 33FA
NB added Debian HPC team into CC.
That is awesome. Thank you Tim and everyone pushing this effort forward!
https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/condor/-/blob/master/debian/changelog
is quite monumental. What is the remaining REQUIRED action to do to
get the package updated? From
https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/condor/-/blob/master/debian/TODO it is
not clear which are REQUIRED or just DESIRED (e.g. rcondor, python
bindings)
Cheers,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Tim Theisen via RT wrote:
> I am working on it. As you can see in https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/condor
> I have just run into many stumbling blocks along the way.
> ...Tim Theisen
> On Mon Jan 09 11:31:18 2023, yoh@dartmouth.edu wrote:
> > Dear HTCondor folks,
> > Thank you for taking over and maintaining htcondor packaging for
> > awhile
> > in Debian. But ATM, the version of htcondor in Debian 8.6.8~dfsg.1-2
> > is
> > 4 years old, saw no updates, accumulated a number of bug reports
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
> bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=0;dist=unstable;ordering=normal;repeatmerged=0;src=condor
> > some of which relate to CVEs. That prevented htcondor from inclusion
> > of
> > htcondor in Debian stable, and even testing now.
> > I wonder if there is a chance for htcondor team to revive the
> > maintainership of the htcondor package in Debian?
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: