Hi. On 17/04/2011 16:25, Joachim Breitner wrote: > fourth idea: Leave it as it is for now and hope that before the next > release of wheezy we either had a haddock bump anyways (and from that > time on installed stuff to a common location), or we can solve the > problem with source-NMUs or source-only-uploads. I think this would be better: you previous proposals imply that you have to move "manually" things that are in the dpkg database, and I don't think this would be a good idea. A round of source-NMUs should be lighter than the one we're doing now, because we'll just need to reupload the same package (not upgrading the package or fixing dependencies or desciptions, that has already been done). Anyway, even if I hope to be more active than I've been in the last months, I'm unfortunately able to guarantee anything, so I think that the last decision should made by Joachim. Ciao, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature