Re: Comments regarding cubicsdr_0.2.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:26:13PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> your package depends on libliquid0d but I can only find libliquid1d. Is this a typo?
No, that was current at the time I uploaded. I have updated the
liquid-dsp library from a git snapshot to a new release since then which
involved a soname bump.
I need to upload a new CubicSDR version anyway because of that, upstream
has now also added SPDX license headers to the source files to make the
license clear in the source files.
Andreas
Reply to: