[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1056765: marked as done (gcc-9: Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r and tilegx arches)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Feb 2024 14:38:41 +0000
with message-id <E1rWHAH-00HNrH-EY@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1056765: fixed in gcc-9 9.5.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056765,
regarding gcc-9: Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r and tilegx arches
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1056765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gcc-9
Source-Version: 9.5.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi!

Support for these arches got removed in dpkg 1.22.0, which means that
once the host running dak gets its dpkg upgraded to that version it
might start being unhappy about the unknown architectures.

Attached an untested patch that removes references to these obsolete
arches.

Thanks,
Guillem

From 4374a74a6f4f48d2bdf59561a8dfbf751bc0d629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:44:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete m32r and tilegx arches

Support for these arches got removed from in dpkg 1.22.0, which means
that once the host running dak gets its dpkg upgraded to that version
it might start being unhappy about the unknown architectures.
---
 debian/control    | 2 +-
 debian/rules.defs | 2 +-
 debian/rules2     | 4 ----
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index ef2254d..12dec06 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9.20141010), dpkg-dev (>= 1.17.14), g++-multilib [a
   gperf (>= 3.0.1), bison (>= 1:2.3), flex, gettext, 
   gdb:native [!riscv64], nvptx-tools [amd64 ppc64el], 
   texinfo (>= 4.3), locales-all, sharutils, 
-  procps, gnat-9:native [!m32r !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4eb !m68k], g++-9:native, netbase, libpth-dev, python3:any, 
+  procps, gnat-9:native [!sh3 !sh3eb !sh4eb !m68k], g++-9:native, netbase, libpth-dev, python3:any, 
   libisl-dev (>= 0.20), libmpc-dev (>= 1.0), libmpfr-dev (>= 3.0.0-9~), libgmp-dev (>= 2:5.0.1~), lib32z1-dev [amd64 kfreebsd-amd64], lib64z1-dev [i386], 
   dejagnu [!m68k] <!nocheck>, coreutils (>= 2.26) | realpath (>= 1.9.12), chrpath, lsb-release, quilt, 
   pkg-config, libgc-dev, 
diff --git a/debian/rules.defs b/debian/rules.defs
index c9689c4..2041d75 100644
--- a/debian/rules.defs
+++ b/debian/rules.defs
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ endif
 
 ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_STAGE),stage1 stage2))
 # Ada --------------------
-ada_no_cpus	:= m32r sh3 sh3eb sh4eb
+ada_no_cpus	:= sh3 sh3eb sh4eb
 # no Debian builds ... some of these should exist
 # ... cross-build-native cross-builds a non-working compiler ...
 ifneq (,$(filter $(build_type), build-native))
diff --git a/debian/rules2 b/debian/rules2
index 41b65ac..1389cc3 100644
--- a/debian/rules2
+++ b/debian/rules2
@@ -533,10 +533,6 @@ ifneq (,$(findstring m68k-linux,$(DEB_TARGET_GNU_TYPE)))
   CONFARGS += --disable-multilib
 endif
 
-ifneq (,$(filter tilegx,$(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU)))
-  CONFARGS += --disable-multilib
-endif
-
 ifneq (,$(findstring riscv64-linux,$(DEB_TARGET_GNU_TYPE)))
   CONFARGS += --disable-multilib
   CONFARGS += --with-arch=rv64imafdc --with-abi=lp64d
-- 
2.42.0

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gcc-9
Source-Version: 9.5.0-5
Done: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1056765@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> (supplier of updated gcc-9 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 14:48:22 +0100
Source: gcc-9
Architecture: source
Version: 9.5.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Closes: 1056765
Changes:
 gcc-9 (9.5.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Allow the gccgo-link test to fail on armhf.
   * Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r and tilegx archs. Closes: #1056765.
   * Don't run the tests with -fstack-protector/-fno-stack-protector on slower
     architectures.
Checksums-Sha1:
 bb2477e855fc7182d290facdf0a9e65246108a9a 21916 gcc-9_9.5.0-5.dsc
 24c50d9f84a6b125c75a683d005af2e2e58430bf 579164 gcc-9_9.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 4eafd8c7fdad8211bbf04d1de67eeb86a2e21179 10015 gcc-9_9.5.0-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f78aae75721fd7c45031266da6c70996d820fb23406003678988d617e8d1d323 21916 gcc-9_9.5.0-5.dsc
 7205558aed63c45d57796cf1a6309ea76ef3bea11e0accaddf40bcf6924d73eb 579164 gcc-9_9.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 ae19792cc925295c30cad26762fb49910264ad0277c6451d7fad491808e5640d 10015 gcc-9_9.5.0-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c62645bff2af13f671b7151b52fbcb5d 21916 devel optional gcc-9_9.5.0-5.dsc
 aa28c62fb3d05269d3dcdeb293828da0 579164 devel optional gcc-9_9.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 4b552f28a7bbf8de3e029fc1d46012a0 10015 devel optional gcc-9_9.5.0-5_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FbC9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: