[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383867: marked as done (It shouldn't be possible to install ecj-bootstrap 3.2 with ecj-bootstrap-gcj 3.1.2)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:49:51 +0200
with message-id <17698.16463.214365.143373@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line fixed in java-gcj-compat-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: ecj-bootstrap
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: important

As stated in the subject, it shouldn't be possible to install
ecj-bootstrap 3.2 with ecj-bootstrap-gcj 3.1.2, which is the reason why
xulrunner failed to build on arm, ecj-bootstrap still not being built on
it.

BTW, I'm curious to know why arm needs ecj-bootstrap-gcj while i386, for
instance, works fine with plain ecj-bootstrap. Is it a speed problem ?

Mike

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.0.65-6

java-gcj-compat-dev doesn't depend on ecj-bootstrap-gcj on arm
anymore.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: