[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#358076: ...



On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:12:51PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

> hmm, I don't see it as a bug. the nice thing is that you can unpack
> old deb's on other places and just use them.

Not with the path resolution policy I was describing.  It starts
out with an absolute path name rooted at /usr and changes state
(ie, location in the directory) relative from there.  How do you
tell your frontend or cpp where to start then ?

> From the man page:
> 
>    The -V and -b options work by running the <machine>-gcc-<version>
>    executable, so there's no real reason to use them if you can just
>    run that directly.

Which makes the existence of both options, what, obsolete, doesn't it ?
Which naturally raises the question why they're there at all ...


Christian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: