Processed: Re: Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken

To: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
Cc: Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>(libstdc++5-3.3-dev #244894)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:03:08 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.108250180315228.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040420225641.GA25111@diamond.madduck.net>
References: <[🔎] 20040420225641.GA25111@diamond.madduck.net>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 244894 + upstream
Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> severity 244894 minor
Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Severity set to `minor'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Next by Date: [Bug c++/11444] [3.3/3.4 regression] function fails to propagate up class tree (template-related)
Previous by thread: Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Next by thread: [Bug c++/11444] [3.3/3.4 regression] function fails to propagate up class tree (template-related)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread