Re: emplacement binaires X11

[Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>]

>>>> "BA" == Benoit Artuso <benoit@proxad.net> writes:

[...]

>> Must n'est pas un non catégorique.

BA> Attention, dans les documents style RFC, 'must' indique une obligation a
BA> laquel on ne peut se soustraire et 'must not' une interdiction.

J'ai encore dis une connerie, surtout que j'avais "lu" sur -devel ceci :

From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

[...]

     Packages that do not conform the the guidelines denoted by
     _must_ (or _required_) will generally not be considered acceptable for
     the Debian distribution.  Non-conformance with guidelines denoted by
     _should_ (or _recommended_) will generally be considered a bug, but
     will not necessarily render a package unsuitable for distribution.
     Guidelines denoted by _may_ (or _optional_) are truly optional and
     adherence is left to the maintainer's discretion.

     These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug severities
     _important_ (for _must_ or _required_ directive violations), _normal_
     (for _should_ or _recommended_ directive violations) and _wishlist_
     (for _optional_ items).

Christian


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-french-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org