Hello, On Thu 10 Aug 2023 at 01:11pm -07, Manphiz wrote: > Thanks for the pointers! I think the reasons given in the bugs are > essentially the same as the scenarios I gave in my other mail, > especially when it is not Emacs itself but the client code that accesses > $HOME. Would the team consider enabling it in dh-elpa given that no > write is done to $HOME/$XDG_* so that no Policy violation happens? There's the risk of bugs here. Setting HOME to /nonexistent ensures that unknown writing to HOME doesn't slip in in a future upload. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature