Hi Paul, On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:56:01PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I guess that's about the best we can do for such -doc packages. I > realize it's slightly "unfair" because of the different treatment we > have in the current freeze, but I wonder if adding autopkgtest (to test > as-installed packages) is really worth it for such packages. > Documentation changes and translations have always been on the exception > list, even very explicitly this time around [1], so I think we're happy > to just unblock manually. Having said that, I'll not stop you from > adding the test. :) thanks for your comments! TBH I was hoping for some prior art in some other doc package, not primarily to ease testing migration but rather to make sure the contents are as we would like them to be. we've had failures to build pdf|epub|html versions of some languages in the past and it would be nice to catch those automatically. I'll guess I'll invent something myself then... -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ There are no jobs on a dead planet. (Also many other things but people mostly seem to care about jobs.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature